During negotiation, one party is very rigid even they are wrong while the other party don't know what to do ?

So what make that right party to win the wrong party in a peaceful negotiation? party A knows that they are not really right, but they try to find justification and argument to support their sides and those reasons they raise are somehow sort of so reasonable that party B really don't know what to do and get stuck finally although party B is not the wrongdoer. Please help with idea.

During negotiation, one party is very rigid even they are wrong while the other party don't know what to do ?
I find that if we are talking about someone with an ulterior motive to win at all costs I t does not make any difference if they are right or wrong.


some individuals cheat.


I have seen someone with a wrong idea win because they beat their opponent up physically.


We must wait for that type to become extinct.


That will be soon. Your particular problem is not set forth with enough information to give solid advice on.


A judge or a lawyer, or even a couselor would need more information. I just look that type of person in the eye and say nothing. They usually know what that means and they just go away.
Reply:On the basis that Party B is probably the only one that thinks that Party A is wrong, and clearly Party A believes it is right, I would suggest that Party A is going to be the winner.





But without a whole lot more information it is impossible to give a more definitive answer
Reply:shoot the bastards
Reply:Sort out the pros and the cons of the case and then try to reason on your strong points. If this fails get another party to judge. this is why we have courts because each side thinks they are right and so a decision has to be made either by a judge or a jury. If the matter isn't a legal one ask the other party if you can have non biased people to sort it out for you.
Reply:Well party B has the obligation to out debate party A.


If party B cannot, then party A is right.


I don't mind being wrong, provided someone can prove me wrong. If they can't...then I consider myself right. It's my job to prove it to another, and their job to prove it to me.





Unless of course, there is NO right or wrong, or it is trival or an emotional issue, then.... just let it go. Let them win this one!
Reply:This not a matter of party A being wrong and knowing it, it is just a matter of whats in their mind. The bible said "the mind is deceitful above all things and desperately wicked, who can know it" you think that they are wrong? but if you go inside their mind you will be suprised to know that they strongly believe that they wrong thing which they did is the wright thing to do. Every body knows that sucide bombing is wrong, but people who do or instigate people to do it, strongly believe that it is wright.
Reply:Round them up, put them in a field and bomb the b*******s.


So says Kenny Everett!
Reply:get party c to bash thier heads together until they both see sense
Reply:just get the other side to explain their argument and once they have done so tell them that it is a weak argument and that you are not willing to change your mind. Be competitive on your strong points and be collaborative on your weak points. Use your judgement and make sure you prepare beforehand!





By the way is this biskit? Its just I recognise that avatar from your msn, unless it is a common one!

shoe polish